Paper detail

Biological Systems as Systems of Increasing Entropy: Language and Genetics

In this paper we will try to provide a formalization of some characteristics of the development of biological systems aiming at the highest level of adequacy: justificative adequacy, that is, not only what we observe (descriptive adequacy) and how we think it occurs (explanatory adequacy) but also what architectural properties (in terms of matter configuration, for example) license the occurrence of certain phenomena. In the case of a biological instantiation of a physical system, justificative adequacy is to be found in the genotype-phenotype dynamics. Moreover, we will claim that such dynamics should be analyzed from a mathematical point of view, since the genotype is hypersensitive to initial conditions: a small change in a certain state of the system may have drastic effects on the output. Regarding methodology, we will use chaos theory applied to biology and also physical genetics in order to frame our research and give it theoretical weight.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.