Paper detail

Bioclimatic change as a function of global warming from CMIP6 climate projections

Climate change is predicted to lead to major changes in terrestrial ecosystems. However, significant differences in climate model projections for given scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions, continue to hinder detailed assessment. Here we show, using a traditional Koppen-Geiger bioclimate classification system, that the latest CMIP6 Earth System Models actually agree very well on the fraction of the global land-surface that will undergo a significant change per degree of global warming. Data from historical and ssp585 model runs are used to create bioclimate maps at various degrees of global warming, and to investigate the performance of the ensemble mean when classifying climate data into discrete categories. Using a streamlined scheme with 13 classifications, global bioclimate classification maps at 2K and 4K of global warming above a 1901-1931 reference period are presented. These projections show large shifts in bioclimate distribution, with an almost exclusive change from colder, wetter bioclimates to hotter, dryer ones. Historical model run performance is assessed and examined by comparison with the bioclimatic classifications derived from the observed climate over the same time period. The fraction of the land experiencing a change in its bioclimatic class as a function of global warming is estimated by combining the results from the individual models. Despite the discrete nature of the bioclimatic classification scheme, we find only a weakly-saturating dependence of this fraction on global warming which implies about 12 pct of land experiencing a significant change in climate, per 1K increase in global mean temperature between the global warming levels of 1 and 3K. Therefore, we estimate that stabilising the climate at 1.5K rather than 2K of global warming, would save over 7 million square kilometres of land from a major bioclimatic change.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.