Paper detail

Bifurcation and segregation in quadratic two-populations Mean Field Games systems

We search for non-constant normalized solutions to the semilinear elliptic system \[ \begin{cases} - νΔv_i + g_i(v_j^2) v_i = λ_i v_i,\quad v_i>0 & \text{in $Ω$} \\ \partial_n v_i = 0 & \text{on $\partial Ω$}\\ \int_Ωv_i^2\,dx = 1, & 1\leq i,j\leq 2, \quad j\neq i, \end{cases} \] where $ν>0$, $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ is smooth and bounded, the functions $g_i$ are positive and increasing, and both the functions $v_i$ and the parameters $λ_i$ are unknown. This system is obtained, via the Hopf-Cole transformation, from a two-populations ergodic Mean Field Games system, which describes Nash equilibria in differential games with identical players. In these models, each population consists of a very large number of indistinguishable rational agents, aiming at minimizing some long-time average criterion. Firstly, we discuss existence of nontrivial solutions, using variational methods when $g_i(s)=s$, and bifurcation ones in the general case; secondly, for selected families of nontrivial solutions, we address the appearing of segregation in the vanishing viscosity limit, i.e. \[ \int_Ω v_1 v_2 \to 0 \qquad \text{as }ν\to0. \]

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.