Paper detail

Beyond KernelBoost

In this Technical Report we propose a set of improvements with respect to the KernelBoost classifier presented in [Becker et al., MICCAI 2013]. We start with a scheme inspired by Auto-Context, but that is suitable in situations where the lack of large training sets poses a potential problem of overfitting. The aim is to capture the interactions between neighboring image pixels to better regularize the boundaries of segmented regions. As in Auto-Context [Tu et al., PAMI 2009] the segmentation process is iterative and, at each iteration, the segmentation results for the previous iterations are taken into account in conjunction with the image itself. However, unlike in [Tu et al., PAMI 2009], we organize our recursion so that the classifiers can progressively focus on difficult-to-classify locations. This lets us exploit the power of the decision-tree paradigm while avoiding over-fitting. In the context of this architecture, KernelBoost represents a powerful building block due to its ability to learn on the score maps coming from previous iterations. We first introduce two important mechanisms to empower the KernelBoost classifier, namely pooling and the clustering of positive samples based on the appearance of the corresponding ground-truth. These operations significantly contribute to increase the effectiveness of the system on biomedical images, where texture plays a major role in the recognition of the different image components. We then present some other techniques that can be easily integrated in the KernelBoost framework to further improve the accuracy of the final segmentation. We show extensive results on different medical image datasets, including some multi-label tasks, on which our method is shown to outperform state-of-the-art approaches. The resulting segmentations display high accuracy, neat contours, and reduced noise.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.