Paper detail

Beta and Kumaraswamy distributions as non-nested hypotheses in the modeling of continuous bounded data

Nowadays, beta and Kumaraswamy distributions are the most popular models to fit continuous bounded data. These models present some characteristics in common and to select one of them in a practical situation can be of great interest. With this in mind, in this paper we propose a method of selection between the beta and Kumaraswamy distributions. We use the logarithm of the likelihood ratio statistic (denoted by $T_n$, where $n$ is the sample size) and obtain its asymptotic distribution under the hypotheses $H_{\mathcal B}$ and $H_{\mathcal K}$, where $H_{\mathcal B}$ ($H_{\mathcal K}$) denotes that the data come from the beta (Kumaraswamy) distribution. Since both models has the same number of parameters, based on the Akaike criterion, we choose the model that has the greater log-likelihood value. We here propose to use the probability of correct selection (given by $P(T_n>0)$ or $P(T_n<0)$ depending on the null hypothesis) instead of only to observe the maximized log-likelihood values. We obtain an approximation for the probability of correct selection under the hypotheses $H_{\mathcal B}$ and $H_{\mathcal K}$ and select the model that maximizes it. A simulation study is presented in order to evaluate the accuracy of the approximated probabilities of correct selection. We illustrate our method of selection in two applications to real data sets involving proportions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.