Paper detail

Bernstein's Lethargy Theorem in Frechet Spaces

In this paper we consider Bernstein's Lethargy Theorem (BLT) in the context of Fréchet spaces. Let $X$ be an infinite-dimensional Fréchet space and let $\mathcal{V}=\{V_n\}$ be a nested sequence of subspaces of $ X$ such that $ \bar{V_n} \subseteq V_{n+1}$ for any $ n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $ X=\bar{\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}V_n}.$ Let $ e_n$ be a decreasing sequence of positive numbers tending to 0. Under an additional natural condition on $\sup\{\{dist}(x, V_n)\}$, we prove that there exists $ x \in X$ and $ n_o \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $$ \frac{e_n}{3} \leq \{dist}(x,V_n) \leq 3 e_n $$ for any $ n \geq n_o$. By using the above theorem, we prove both Shapiro's \cite{Sha} and Tyuremskikh's \cite{Tyu} theorems for Fréchet spaces. Considering rapidly decreasing sequences, other versions of the BLT theorem in Fréchet spaces will be discussed. We also give a theorem improving Konyagin's \cite{Kon} result for Banach spaces.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.