Paper detail

Benjamin-Feir instability of Stokes waves in finite depth

Whitham and Benjamin predicted in 1967 that small-amplitude periodic traveling Stokes waves of the 2d-gravity water waves equations are linearly unstable with respect to long-wave perturbations, if the depth $\mathtt h$ is larger than a critical threshold $\mathtt h_{WB} \approx 1.363$. In this paper we completely describe, for any value of $\mathtt h > 0$, the four eigenvalues close to zero of the linearized equations at the Stokes wave, as the Floquet exponent $μ$ is turned on. We prove in particular the existence of a unique depth $\mathtt h_{WB}$, which coincides with the one predicted by Whitham and Benjamin, such that, for any $0 < \mathtt h < \mathtt h_{WB}$, the eigenvalues close to zero remain purely imaginary and, for any $\mathtt h > \mathtt h_{WB}$, a pair of non-purely imaginary eigenvalues depicts a closed figure &#34;8&#34;, parameterized by the Floquet exponent. As $\mathtt h \to \mathtt h_{WB}^+$ this figure &#34;8&#34; collapses to the origin of the complex plane. The proof combines a symplectic version of Kato&#39;s perturbative theory to compute the eigenvalues of a $4 \times 4$ Hamiltonian and reversible matrix, and KAM inspired transformations to block-diagonalize it. The four eigenvalues have all the same size $O(μ)$ - unlike the infinitely deep water case in [6]- and the correct Benjamin-Feir phenomenon appears only after one non-perturbative block-diagonalization step. In addition one has to track, along the whole proof, the explicit dependence of the entries of the $4 \times 4$ reduced matrix with respect to the depth $\mathtt h$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.