Paper detail

Benchmarking the cost of thread divergence in CUDA

All modern processors include a set of vector instructions. While this gives a tremendous boost to the performance, it requires a vectorized code that can take advantage of such instructions. As an ideal vectorization is hard to achieve in practice, one has to decide when different instructions may be applied to different elements of the vector operand. This is especially important in implicit vectorization as in NVIDIA CUDA Single Instruction Multiple Threads (SIMT) model, where the vectorization details are hidden from the programmer. In order to assess the costs incurred by incompletely vectorized code, we have developed a micro-benchmark that measures the characteristics of the CUDA thread divergence model on different architectures focusing on the loops performance.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.