Paper detail

Benchmarking the accuracy of seniority-zero wavefunction methods for non-covalent interactions

In this paper, we scrutinize the ability of seniority-zero wavefunction-based methods to model different types of non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonds, dispersion, and mixed non-covalent interactions as well as prototypical model systems with various contributions of dynamic and static electron correlation effects. Specifically, we focus on the pair Coupled-Cluster Doubles (pCCD) ansatz combined with two different flavours of dynamic energy corrections, (i) based on a perturbation theory correction and (ii) on a linearized coupled-cluster ansatz on top of pCCD. We benchmark these approaches against the A24 data set [Řez{á}{č} and Hobza, J.~Chem.~Theory~Comput., 9, 2151-2155 (2013)] extrapolated to the basis set limit and some model non-covalent complexes that feature covalent bond breaking. By dissecting different types of interactions in the A24 data set within the Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) framework, we demonstrate that pCCD can be classified as a dispersion-free method. Furthermore, we found that both flavours of post-pCCD approaches represent encouraging and computationally more efficient alternatives to standard electronic structure methods to model weakly-bound systems, resulting in small statistical errors. Finally, a linearized coupled cluster correction on top of pCCD proved to be most reliable for the majority of investigated systems, featuring smaller non-parallelity errors compared to perturbation-theory-based approaches.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.