Paper detail

Benchmarking mixed-mode PETSc performance on high-performance architectures

The trend towards highly parallel multi-processing is ubiquitous in all modern computer architectures, ranging from handheld devices to large-scale HPC systems; yet many applications are struggling to fully utilise the multiple levels of parallelism exposed in modern high-performance platforms. In order to realise the full potential of recent hardware advances, a mixed-mode between shared-memory programming techniques and inter-node message passing can be adopted which provides high-levels of parallelism with minimal overheads. For scientific applications this entails that not only the simulation code itself, but the whole software stack needs to evolve. In this paper, we evaluate the mixed-mode performance of PETSc, a widely used scientific library for the scalable solution of partial differential equations. We describe the addition of OpenMP threaded functionality to the library, focusing on sparse matrix-vector multiplication. We highlight key challenges in achieving good parallel performance, such as explicit communication overlap using task-based parallelism, and show how to further improve performance by explicitly load balancing threads within MPI processes. Using a set of matrices extracted from Fluidity, a CFD application code which uses the library as its linear solver engine, we then benchmark the parallel performance of mixed-mode PETSc across multiple nodes on several modern HPC architectures. We evaluate the parallel scalability on Uniform Memory Access (UMA) systems, such as the Fujitsu PRIMEHPC FX10 and IBM BlueGene/Q, as well as a Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) Cray XE6 platform. A detailed comparison is performed which highlights the characteristics of each particular architecture, before demonstrating efficient strong scalability of sparse matrix-vector multiplication with significant speedups over the pure-MPI mode.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.