Paper detail

Benchmarking Gaussian Basis Sets in Quantum-Chemical Calculations of Photoabsorption Spectra of Light Atomic Clusters

The choice of Gaussian basis functions for computing the ground-state properties of molecules, and clusters, employing wave-function-based electron-correlated approaches, is a well-studied subject. However, the same cannot be said when it comes to the excited-state properties of such systems, in general, and optical properties, in particular. The aim of the present study is to understand how the choice of basis functions affects the calculations of linear optical absorption in clusters, qualitatively, and quantitatively. For this purpose, we have calculated linear optical absorption spectra of several small charged and neutral clusters, namely, Li$_{2}$, Li$_{3}$, Li$_{4}$, B$_{2}^{+}$, B$_{3}^{+}$, Be$_{2}^{+}$, and Be$_{3}^{+}$, using a variety of Gaussian basis sets. The calculations were performed within the frozen-core approximation, and a rigorous account of electron correlation effects in the valence sector was taken by employing various levels of configuration interaction (CI) approach both for the ground and excited states. Our results on the peak locations in the absorption spectra of Li$_{3}$ and Li$_{4}$ are in very good agreement with the experiments. Our general recommendation is that for excited-state calculations, it is very important to utilize those basis sets which contain augmented functions. Relatively smaller aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets also yield high-quality results for photoabsorption spectra, and are recommended for such calculations if the computational resources are limited.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.