Paper detail

Benchmarking exchange-correlation potentials with the mstar60 dataset: Importance of the nonlocal exchange potential for effective mass calculations in semiconductors

The accuracy of effective masses predicted by density functional theory depends on the exchange-correlation functional employed, with nonlocal hybrid functionals giving more accurate results than semilocal functionals. In this article, we benchmark the performance of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE), Tran-Blaha modified Becke-Johnson (TB-mBJ), and the hybrid Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) exchange-correlation functionals and potentials for the calculation of effective masses with perturbation theory. We introduce the mstar60 dataset, which contains 60 effective masses derived from 18 semiconductors. The ratio between experimental and calculated effective masses is $1.70 \pm 0.20$ for PBE, $0.76 \pm 0.04$ for TB-mBJ, $0.99 \pm 0.04$ for HSE06. We reveal that the nonlocal exchange in HSE06 enlarges the optical transition matrix elements leading to the superior accuracy of the hybrid functional in the calculation of effective masses. The omission of nonlocal exchange in the transition operator for HSE leads to serious errors. For the semilocal PBE functional, the errors in the bandgap and the optical transition matrix elements partially cancel out in the calculation of effective masses. The TB-mBJ functional yields PBE-like matrix elements paired with realistic bandgaps leading to a consistent overestimation of effective masses. However, if only limited computational resources are available, experimental masses can be estimated by multiplying TB-mBJ masses with the factor of 0.76. We then compare effective masses of transition metal dichalcogenide bulk and monolayer materials: we show that changes in the matrix elements are important in understanding the layer-dependent effective mass renormalization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.