Paper detail

Behavior of $\mathbf{Σ3}$ grain boundaries in \CISe\ and \CGSe\ photovoltaic absorbers as revealed by first-principles hybrid functional calculations

The inconclusive results of the previous first-principles studies on the \S3 \ grain boundaries (GBs) in \CISe\ reveal the importance of employing a method that can correctly describe the electronic structure of this solar-cell material. We have employed hybrid functional calculations to study the \S3 (112) and \S3 (114) GBs in \CISe\ and \CGSe. The electronic structure changes introduced by the formation of GBs are threefold: creation of gap states, shift in band edges, and alteration of bandgap sizes. Gap states commonly behave as recombination centers, but the band alignment and the change in the bandgap size induced by GBs mitigate the destructive effect of these states in \CISe. That means, \S3 \ GBs are not detrimental for the carrier transport in devices based on \CISe. Conversely, these GBs are destructive for the carrier transport in \CGSe. The different behaviors of the \S3 \ GBs in CISe and CGSe might be considered by experimentalists to optimize the device fabrication to achieve high-performance solar cells.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.