Paper detail

Beeping Shortest Paths via Hypergraph Bipartite Decomposition

Constructing a shortest path between two network nodes is a fundamental task in distributed computing. This work develops schemes for the construction of shortest paths in randomized beeping networks between a predetermined source node and an arbitrary set of destination nodes. Our first scheme constructs a (single) shortest path to an arbitrary destination in $O (D \log\log n + \log^3 n)$ rounds with high probability. Our second scheme constructs multiple shortest paths, one per each destination, in $O (D \log^2 n + \log^3 n)$ rounds with high probability. Our schemes are based on a reduction of the above shortest path construction tasks to a decomposition of hypergraphs into bipartite hypergraphs: We develop a beeping procedure that partitions the (polynomially-large) hyperedge set of a hypergraph $H = (V_H, E_H)$ into $k = Θ(\log^2 n)$ disjoint subsets $F_1 \cup \cdots \cup F_k = E_H$ such that the (sub-)hypergraph $(V_H, F_i)$ is bipartite in the sense that there exists a vertex subset $U \subseteq V$ such that $|U \cap e| = 1$ for every $e \in F_i$. This procedure turns out to be instrumental in speeding up shortest path constructions under the beeping model.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.