Paper detail

Bayesian variable selection for spatially dependent generalized linear models

Despite the abundance of methods for variable selection and accommodating spatial structure in regression models, there is little precedent for incorporating spatial dependence in covariate inclusion probabilities for regionally varying regression models. The lone existing approach is limited by difficult computation and the requirement that the spatial dependence be represented on a lattice, making this method inappropriate for areal models with irregular structures that often arise in ecology, epidemiology, and the social sciences. Here we present a novel method for spatial variable selection in areal generalized linear models that can accommodate arbitrary spatial structures and works with a broad subset of GLM likelihoods. The method uses a latent probit model with a spatial dependence structure where the binary response is taken as a covariate inclusion indicator for area-specific GLMs. The covariate inclusion indicators arise via thresholding of latent standard normals on which we place a conditionally autoregressive prior. We propose an efficient MCMC algorithm for computation that is entirely conjugate in any model with a conditionally Gaussian representation of the likelihood, thereby encompassing logistic, probit, multinomial probit and logit, Gaussian, and negative binomial regressions through the use of existing data augmentation methods. We demonstrate superior parameter recovery and prediction in simulation studies as well as in applications to geographic voting patterns and population estimation. Though the method is very broadly applicable, we note in particular that prior to this work, spatial population estimation/capture-recapture models allowing for varying list dependence structures has not been possible.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.