Paper detail

Bayesian truncation errors in equations of state of nuclear matter with chiral nucleon-nucleon potentials

The truncation errors in equations of state (EOSs) of nuclear matter derived from the chiral nucleon-nucleon ($NN$) potentials at different expansion orders are analyzed by a Bayesian model. These EOSs are expanded as functions of a dimensionless parameter, $Q$, which is determined by Fermi momentum, $k_F$ and breakdown scale, $Λ_b$. The degree-of-belief (DoB) intervals predicted by the chiral effective field theory are calculated within the corresponding expansion coefficients and the specific prior probability distribution functions in terms of Bayes theorem. The truncation errors of EOSs, generated by the DoB intervals, exhibit good order-by-order convergences with different chiral expansion order potentials. When DoB is considered as $1σ$ credibility, i.e., $68.27\%$ confidence interval, the truncation errors of binding energy per nucleon in symmetric nuclear matter and pure neutron matter are consistent with the results given by a simple error analysis method proposed by Epelbaum, {\it et al.} Finally, the reasonable values of the breakdown scale $Λ_b$ in nuclear matter are discussed through consistency checks of Bayesian method based on the calculations of success rate.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.