Paper detail

Bayesian Regression Analysis of Data with Random Effects Covariates from Nonlinear Longitudinal Measurements

Joint models for a wide class of response variables and longitudinal measurements consist on a mixed-effects model to fit longitudinal trajectories whose random effects enter as covariates in a generalized linear model for the primary response. They provide a useful way to asses association between these two kinds of data, which in clinical studies are often collected jointly on a series of individuals and may help understanding, for instance, the mechanisms of recovery of a certain disease or the efficacy of a given therapy. The most common joint model in this framework is based on a linear mixed model for the longitudinal data. However, for complex datasets the linearity assumption may be too restrictive. Some works have considered generalizing this setting with the use of a nonlinear mixed-effects model for the longitudinal trajectories but the proposed estimation procedures based on likelihood approximations have been shown De la Cruz et al. (2011) to exhibit some computational efficiency problems. In this article we propose an MCMC-based estimation procedure in the joint model with a nonlinear mixed-effects model for the longitudinal data and a generalized linear model for the primary response. Moreover, we consider that the errors in the longitudinal model may be correlated. We apply our method to the analysis of hormone levels measured at the early stages of pregnancy that can be used to predict normal versus abnormal pregnancy outcomes. We also conduct a simulation study to asses the importance of modelling correlated errors and quantify the consequences of model misspecification.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.