Paper detail

Bayesian quadrature for $H^1(μ)$ with Poincaré inequality on a compact interval

Motivated by uncertainty quantification of complex systems, we aim at finding quadrature formulas of the form $\int_a^b f(x) dμ(x) = \sum_{i=1}^n w_i f(x_i)$ where $f$ belongs to $H^1(μ)$. Here, $μ$ belongs to a class of continuous probability distributions on $[a, b] \subset \mathbb{R}$ and $\sum_{i=1}^n w_i δ_{x_i}$ is a discrete probability distribution on $[a, b]$. We show that $H^1(μ)$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space with a continuous kernel $K$, which allows to reformulate the quadrature question as a Bayesian (or kernel) quadrature problem. Although $K$ has not an easy closed form in general, we establish a correspondence between its spectral decomposition and the one associated to Poincaré inequalities, whose common eigenfunctions form a $T$-system (Karlin and Studden, 1966). The quadrature problem can then be solved in the finite-dimensional proxy space spanned by the first eigenfunctions. The solution is given by a generalized Gaussian quadrature, which we call Poincaré quadrature. We derive several results for the Poincaré quadrature weights and the associated worst-case error. When $μ$ is the uniform distribution, the results are explicit: the Poincaré quadrature is equivalent to the midpoint (rectangle) quadrature rule. Its nodes coincide with the zeros of an eigenfunction and the worst-case error scales as $\frac{b-a}{2\sqrt{3}}n^{-1}$ for large $n$. By comparison with known results for $H^1(0,1)$, this shows that the Poincaré quadrature is asymptotically optimal. For a general $μ$, we provide an efficient numerical procedure, based on finite elements and linear programming. Numerical experiments provide useful insights: nodes are nearly evenly spaced, weights are close to the probability density at nodes, and the worst-case error is approximately $O(n^{-1})$ for large $n$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.