Paper detail

Bayesian neural networks for weak solution of PDEs with uncertainty quantification

Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) is the canonical approach for understanding the behavior of physical systems. However, large scale solutions of PDEs using state of the art discretization techniques remains an expensive proposition. In this work, a new physics-constrained neural network (NN) approach is proposed to solve PDEs without labels, with a view to enabling high-throughput solutions in support of design and decision-making. Distinct from existing physics-informed NN approaches, where the strong form or weak form of PDEs are used to construct the loss function, we write the loss function of NNs based on the discretized residual of PDEs through an efficient, convolutional operator-based, and vectorized implementation. We explore an encoder-decoder NN structure for both deterministic and probabilistic models, with Bayesian NNs (BNNs) for the latter, which allow us to quantify both epistemic uncertainty from model parameters and aleatoric uncertainty from noise in the data. For BNNs, the discretized residual is used to construct the likelihood function. In our approach, both deterministic and probabilistic convolutional layers are used to learn the applied boundary conditions (BCs) and to detect the problem domain. As both Dirichlet and Neumann BCs are specified as inputs to NNs, a single NN can solve for similar physics, but with different BCs and on a number of problem domains. The trained surrogate PDE solvers can also make interpolating and extrapolating (to a certain extent) predictions for BCs that they were not exposed to during training. Such surrogate models are of particular importance for problems, where similar types of PDEs need to be repeatedly solved for many times with slight variations. We demonstrate the capability and performance of the proposed framework by applying it to steady-state diffusion, linear elasticity, and nonlinear elasticity.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.