Paper detail

Bayesian Multi-Species N-Mixture Models for Unmarked Animal Communities

We propose an extension of the N-mixture model which allows for the estimation of both abundances of multiple species simultaneously and their inter-species correlations. We also propose further extensions to this multi-species N-mixture model, one of which permits us to examine data which has an excess of zero counts, and another which allows us to relax the assumption of closure inherent in N-mixture models through the incorporation of an AR term in the abundance. The inclusion of a multivariate normal distribution as prior on the random effect in the abundance facilitates the estimation of a matrix of interspecies correlations. Each model is also fitted to avian point data collected as part of the NABBS 2010-2019. Results of simulation studies reveal that these models produce accurate estimates of abundance, inter-species correlations and detection probabilities at both small and large sample sizes, in scenarios with small, large and no zero inflation. Results of model-fitting to the North American Breeding Bird Survey data reveal an increase in Bald Eagle population size in southeastern Alaska in the decade examined.Our novel multi-species N-mixture model accounts for full communities, allowing us to examine abundances of every species present in a study area and, as these species do not exist in a vacuum, allowing us to estimate correlations between species' abundances.While previous multi-species abundance models have allowed for the estimation of abundance and detection probability, ours is the first to address the estimation of both positive and negative inter-species correlations, which allows us to begin to make inferences as to the effect that these species' abundances have on one another. Our modelling approach provides a method of quantifying the strength of association between species' population sizes, and is of practical use to population and conservation ecologists.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.