Paper detail

Bayesian model selection on Scalar $ε$-Field Dark Energy

The main aim of this paper is to analyse minimally-coupled scalar-fields -- quintessence and phantom -- as the main candidates to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe and compare its observables to current cosmological observations; as a byproduct we present its python module. This work includes a parameter $ε$ which allows to incorporate both quintessence and phantom fields within the same analysis. Examples of the potentials, so far included, are $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ^α}$ and $V(ϕ)=V_0(\cosh(αϕ)+β)$ with $α$, $μ$ and $β$ being free parameters, but the analysis can be easily extended to any other scalar field potential. Additional to the field component and the standard content of matter, the study also incorporates the contribution from spatial curvature ($Ω_k$), as it has been the focus in recent studies. The analysis contains the most up-to-date datasets along with a nested sampler to produce posterior distributions along with the Bayesian evidence, that allows to perform a model selection. In this work we constrain the parameter-space describing the two generic potentials, and among several combinations, we found that the best-fit to current datasets is given by a model slightly favouring the quintessence field with potential $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ}$ with $β=0.22\pm 1.56$, $μ= -0.41\pm 1.90$, and slightly negative curvature $Ω_{k,0}=-0.0016\pm0.0018$, which presents deviations of $1.6σ$ from the standard $Λ$CDM model. Even though this potential contains three extra parameters, the Bayesian evidence $\mathcal{B}_{Λ, ϕ} =2.0$ is unable to distinguish this model compared to the $Λ$CDM with curvature ($Ω_{k,0}=0.0013\pm0.0018$). The potential that provides the minimal Bayesian evidence corresponds to $V(ϕ)=V_0 \cosh(αϕ)$ with $α=-0.61\pm 1.36$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.