Researcher profile

David Tamayo

David Tamayo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Thermodynamics of viscous dark energy for the late future time universe

In this work we explore the thermodynamic aspects of dark energy for late future time universe in two different scenarios: as a perfect fluid with constant and variable equation of state parameter; and as dissipative fluid described by a barotropic equation of state with bulk viscosity in the framework of the Eckart theory and the full Israel-Stewart theory. We explore cosmological solutions for a flat, homogeneous and isotropic universe; and we assume the late future time behavior when the dark energy dominates the cosmic evolution. When modeled as a perfect fluid with a dynamical equation of state, $p=w(a)ρ$, the dark energy has an energy density, temperature and entropy well defined and an interesting result is that there is no entropy production even though been dynamical. For dissipative dark energy, in the Eckart theory two cases are studied: $ξ=const.$ and $ξ=(β/\sqrt{3}) ρ^{1/2}$; it is found that the entropy grows exponentially for the first case and as a power-law for the second. In the Israel-Stewart theory we consider a $ξ=ξ_0 ρ^{1/2}$ and a relaxation time $τ= ξ/ρ$; an analytical Big Rip solution is obtained with a power-law entropy. In all cases a power-law relation between temperature and energy density is obtained. In order to maintain the second law of thermodynamics theoretical constraints for the equation of state are found in the different dark energy models studied. A barotropic dark fluid with $w<-1$ is thermodynamically difficult to support, but the overall effect of bulk viscosity in certain cases allows a phantom regime without thermodynamic anomalies.

preprint2021arXiv

Bayesian model selection on Scalar $ε$-Field Dark Energy

The main aim of this paper is to analyse minimally-coupled scalar-fields -- quintessence and phantom -- as the main candidates to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe and compare its observables to current cosmological observations; as a byproduct we present its python module. This work includes a parameter $ε$ which allows to incorporate both quintessence and phantom fields within the same analysis. Examples of the potentials, so far included, are $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ^α}$ and $V(ϕ)=V_0(\cosh(αϕ)+β)$ with $α$, $μ$ and $β$ being free parameters, but the analysis can be easily extended to any other scalar field potential. Additional to the field component and the standard content of matter, the study also incorporates the contribution from spatial curvature ($Ω_k$), as it has been the focus in recent studies. The analysis contains the most up-to-date datasets along with a nested sampler to produce posterior distributions along with the Bayesian evidence, that allows to perform a model selection. In this work we constrain the parameter-space describing the two generic potentials, and among several combinations, we found that the best-fit to current datasets is given by a model slightly favouring the quintessence field with potential $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ}$ with $β=0.22\pm 1.56$, $μ= -0.41\pm 1.90$, and slightly negative curvature $Ω_{k,0}=-0.0016\pm0.0018$, which presents deviations of $1.6σ$ from the standard $Λ$CDM model. Even though this potential contains three extra parameters, the Bayesian evidence $\mathcal{B}_{Λ, ϕ} =2.0$ is unable to distinguish this model compared to the $Λ$CDM with curvature ($Ω_{k,0}=0.0013\pm0.0018$). The potential that provides the minimal Bayesian evidence corresponds to $V(ϕ)=V_0 \cosh(αϕ)$ with $α=-0.61\pm 1.36$.