Paper detail

Bayesian Estimation of Experimental Parameters in Stochastic Inertial Systems: Theory, Simulations, and Experiments with Objects Levitated in Vacuum

High-quality nanomechanical oscillators can sensitively probe force, mass, or displacement in experiments bridging the gap between the classical and quantum domain. Dynamics of these stochastic systems is inherently determined by the interplay between acting external forces, viscous dissipation, and random driving by the thermal environment. The importance of inertia then dictates that both position and momentum must, in principle, be known to fully describe the system, which makes its quantitative experimental characterization rather challenging. We introduce a general method of Bayesian inference of the force field and environmental parameters in stochastic inertial systems that operates solely on the time series of recorded noisy positions of the system. The method is first validated on simulated trajectories of model stochastic harmonic and anharmonic oscillators with damping. Subsequently, the method is applied to experimental trajectories of particles levitating in tailored optical fields and used to characterize the dynamics of particle motion in a nonlinear Duffing potential, a static or time-dependent double-well potential, and a non-conservative force field. The presented inference procedure does not make any simplifying assumptions about the nature or symmetry of the acting force field and provides robust results with trajectories two orders of magnitude shorter than those typically required by alternative inference schemes. In addition to being a powerful tool for quantitative data analysis, it can also guide experimentalists in choosing appropriate sampling frequency (at least 20 measured points per single characteristic period) and length of the measured trajectories (at least 10 periods) to estimate the force field and environmental characteristics with a desired accuracy and precision.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.