Paper detail

Bayesian estimate of the zero-density frequency of a Cs fountain

Caesium fountain frequency-standards realize the second in the International System of Units with a relative uncertainty approaching 10^-16. Among the main contributions to the accuracy budget, cold collisions play an important role because of the atomic density shift of the reference atomic transition. This paper describes an application of the Bayesian analysis of the clock frequency to estimate the density shift and describes how the Bayes theorem allows the a priori knowledge of the sign of the collisional coefficient to be rigourously embedded into the analysis. As an application, data from the INRIM caesium fountain are used and the Bayesian and orthodox analyses are compared. The Bayes theorem allows the orthodox uncertainty to be reduced by 28% and demonstrates to be an important tool in primary frequency-metrology.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.