Paper detail

bayesassurance: An R package for calculating sample size and Bayesian assurance

We present a bayesassurance R package that computes the Bayesian assurance under various settings characterized by different assumptions and objectives. The package offers a constructive set of simulation-based functions suitable for addressing a wide range of clinical trial study design problems. We provide a detailed description of the underlying framework embedded within each of the power and assurance functions and demonstrate their usage through a series of worked-out examples. Through these examples, we hope to corroborate the advantages that come with using a two-stage generalized structure. We also illustrate scenarios where the Bayesian assurance and frequentist power overlap, allowing the user to address both Bayesian and classical inference problems provided that the parameters are properly defined. All assurance-related functions included in this R package rely on a two-stage Bayesian method that assigns two distinct priors to evaluate the unconditional probability of observing a positive outcome, which in turn addresses subtle limitations that take place when using the standard single-prior approach.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.