Paper detail

Bayes factors and the geometry of discrete hierarchical loglinear models

A standard tool for model selection in a Bayesian framework is the Bayes factor which compares the marginal likelihood of the data under two given different models. In this paper, we consider the class of hierarchical loglinear models for discrete data given under the form of a contingency table with multinomial sampling. We assume that the Diaconis-Ylvisaker conjugate prior is the prior distribution on the loglinear parameters and the uniform is the prior distribution on the space of models. Under these conditions, the Bayes factor between two models is a function of their prior and posterior normalizing constants. These constants are functions of the hyperparameters $(m,α)$ which can be interpreted respectively as marginal counts and the total count of a fictive contingency table. We study the behaviour of the Bayes factor when $α$ tends to zero. In this study two mathematical objects play a most important role. They are, first, the interior $C$ of the convex hull $\bar{C}$ of the support of the multinomial distribution for a given hierarchical loglinear model together with its faces and second, the characteristic function $\mathbb{J}_C$ of this convex set $C$. We show that, when $α$ tends to 0, if the data lies on a face $F_i$ of $\bar{C_i},i=1,2$ of dimension $k_i$, the Bayes factor behaves like $α^{k_1-k_2}$. This implies in particular that when the data is in $C_1$ and in $C_2$, i.e. when $k_i$ equals the dimension of model $J_i$, the sparser model is favored, thus confirming the idea of Bayesian regularization.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.