Paper detail

Bayes Factor of Zero Inflated Models under Jeffereys Prior

Microbiome omics data including 16S rRNA reveal intriguing dynamic associations between the human microbiome and various disease states. Drastic changes in microbiota can be associated with factors like diet, hormonal cycles, diseases, and medical interventions. Along with the identification of specific bacteria taxa associated with diseases, recent advancements give evidence that metabolism, genetics, and environmental factors can model these microbial effects. However, the current analytic methods for integrating microbiome data are fully developed to address the main challenges of longitudinal metagenomics data, such as high-dimensionality, intra-sample dependence, and zero-inflation of observed counts. Hence, we propose the Bayes factor approach for model selection based on negative binomial, Poisson, zero-inflated negative binomial, and zero-inflated Poisson models with non-informative Jeffreys prior. We find that both in simulation studies and real data analysis, our Bayes factor remarkably outperform traditional Akaike information criterion and Vuong's test. A new R package BFZINBZIP has been introduced to do simulation study and real data analysis to facilitate Bayesian model selection based on the Bayes factor.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.