Paper detail

$\bar{B}^0_s \to (π^0 η^{(*)}, η^{(*)}η^{(*)})$ decays and the effects of next-to-leading order contributions in the perturbative QCD approach

In this paper, we calculate the branching ratios and CP violating asymmetries of the five $\bar{B}^0_s \to (π^0η^{(*)},η^{(*)}η^{(*)})$ decays, by employing the perturbative QCD (pQCD) factorization approach and with the inclusion of all currently known next-to-leading order (NLO) contributions. We find that (a) the NLO contributions can provide about 100% enhancements to the LO pQCD predictions for the decay rates of $\bar{B}_s^0 \to ηη^\prime$ and $η^\prime η^\prime$ decays, but result in small changes to $Br(\bar{B}_s \to π^0 η^{(*)})$ and $Br(\bar{B}_s \to ηη)$; (b) the newly known NLO twist-2 and twist-3 contributions to the relevant form factors can provide about 10% enhancements to the decay rates of the considered decays; (c) for $\bar{B}_s \to π^0 η^{(*)}$ decays, their direct CP-violating asymmetries $\cala_f^{dir}$ could be enhanced significantly by the inclusion of the NLO contributions; and (d) the pQCD predictions for $Br(\bar{B}_s \to ηη^{(*)})$ and $Br(\bar{B}_s \to η^\prime η^\prime)$ can be as large as $4\times 10^{-5}$, which may be measurable at LHCb or the forthcoming super-B experiments.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.