Paper detail

Bandwidth-Optimal Random Shuffling for GPUs

Linear-time algorithms that are traditionally used to shuffle data on CPUs, such as the method of Fisher-Yates, are not well suited to implementation on GPUs due to inherent sequential dependencies, and existing parallel shuffling algorithms are unsuitable for GPU architectures because they incur a large number of read/write operations to high latency global memory. To address this, we provide a method of generating pseudo-random permutations in parallel by fusing suitable pseudo-random bijective functions with stream compaction operations. Our algorithm, termed `bijective shuffle' trades increased per-thread arithmetic operations for reduced global memory transactions. It is work-efficient, deterministic, and only requires a single global memory read and write per shuffle input, thus maximising use of global memory bandwidth. To empirically demonstrate the correctness of the algorithm, we develop a statistical test for the quality of pseudo-random permutations based on kernel space embeddings. Experimental results show that the bijective shuffle algorithm outperforms competing algorithms on GPUs, showing improvements of between one and two orders of magnitude and approaching peak device bandwidth.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.