Paper detail

Bandwidth Cost of Code Conversions in Distributed Storage: Fundamental Limits and Optimal Constructions

Erasure codes have become an integral part of distributed storage systems as a tool for providing data reliability and durability under the constant threat of device failures. In such systems, an $[n, k]$ code over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ encodes $k$ message symbols into $n$ codeword symbols from $\mathbb{F}_q$ which are then stored on $n$ different nodes in the system. Recent work has shown that significant savings in storage space can be obtained by tuning $n$ and $k$ to variations in device failure rates. Such a tuning necessitates code conversion: the process of converting already encoded data under an initial $[n^I, k^I]$ code to its equivalent under a final $[n^F, k^F]$ code. The default approach to conversion is to reencode data, which places significant burden on system resources. Convertible codes are a recently proposed class of codes for enabling resource-efficient conversions. Existing work on convertible codes has focused on minimizing access cost, i.e., the number of code symbols accessed during conversion. Bandwidth, which corresponds to the amount of data read and transferred, is another important resource to optimize. In this paper, we initiate the study on the fundamental limits on bandwidth used during code conversion and present constructions for bandwidth-optimal convertible codes. First, we model the code conversion problem using network information flow graphs with variable capacity edges. Second, focusing on MDS codes and an important parameter regime called the merge regime, we derive tight lower bounds on the bandwidth cost of conversion. The derived bounds show that bandwidth cost can be significantly reduced even in regimes where access cost cannot be reduced as compared to the default approach. Third, we present a new construction for MDS convertible codes which matches the proposed lower bound and is thus bandwidth-optimal during conversion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.