Paper detail

Band-Renormalization Effects and Predominant Antiferromagnetic Order in Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model

Band renormalization effects (BRE) are comprehensively studied for a mixed state of dx2-y2-wave superconducting (d-SC) and antiferromagnetic (AF) orders, in addition to simple d-SC, AF, and normal (paramagnetic) states, by applying a variational Monte Carlo method to a two-dimensional Hubbard (t-t&#39;-U) model. In a weakly correlated regime (U=t<~6), BRE are negligible on all the states studied. As previously shown, the effective band of d-SC is greatly renormalized but the modifications of physical quantities, including energy improvement, are negligible. In contrast, BRE on the AF state considerably affects various features of the system. Because the energy is markedly improved for t&#39;/t<0, the AF state occupies almost the whole underdoped regime in phase diagrams. A doped metallic AF state undergoes a kind of Lifshitz transition at t&#39;= t&#39;L~-0.05t as t&#39;/t varies, irrespective of the values of U/t and delta (doping rate). Pocket Fermi surfaces arise around (pi,0)[(pi/2,pi/2)] for t&#39;>t&#39;L [t&#39;<t&#39;L], which corresponds to the electron-hole asymmetry observed in angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) spectra. The coexistent state of the two orders is possible basically for t&#39;>t&#39;L, because the existence of Fermi surfaces near (pi,0) is a requisite for the electron scattering of q=(pi,pi). Actually, the coexistent state appears mainly for t&#39;L/t<t&#39;/t<~0.2 in the mixed state. Nevertheless, the AF and coexisting states become unstable toward phase separation for -0.05<~t&#39;/t<~0.2 but become stable at other values of t&#39;/t owing to the energy reduction by the diagonal hopping of doped holes. We show that this instability does not directly correlate with the strength of d-SC.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.