Paper detail

Balanced configurations of points in the plane

A balanced configuration of points on the sphere $S^2$ is a (finite) set of points which are in equilibrium if they act on each other according any force law dependent only on the distance between two points. The configuration is additionally group-balanced if for each point in a configuration $\mathcal{C}$, there is a symmetry of $\mathcal{C}$ fixing only that point and its antipode. Leech showed that these definitions are equivalent on the sphere $S^2$ by classifying all possible balanced configurations. On the other hand, Cohn, Elkies, Kumar, and Schürmann showed that for $n\geq 7,$ there are examples of balanced configurations in $S^{n-1}$ which are not group balanced. They also suggested extending the notion of balanced configurations to Euclidean space, and conjectured that at least in the case of the plane, all discrete balanced configurations in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are group-balanced. We verify a reformulation of this conjecture by providing a complete classification of the balanced configurations in $\mathbb{R}^2$ satisfying a certain minimal distance property.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.