Paper detail

Balance is key: Private median splits yield high-utility random trees

Random forests are a popular method for classification and regression due to their versatility. However, this flexibility can come at the cost of user privacy, since training random forests requires multiple data queries, often on small, identifiable subsets of the training data. Privatizing these queries typically comes at a high utility cost, in large part because we are privatizing queries on small subsets of the data, which are easily corrupted by added noise. In this paper, we propose DiPriMe forests, a novel tree-based ensemble method for differentially private regression and classification, which is appropriate for real or categorical covariates. We generate splits using a differentially private version of the median, which encourages balanced leaf nodes. By avoiding low occupancy leaf nodes, we avoid high signal-to-noise ratios when privatizing the leaf node sufficient statistics. We show theoretically and empirically that the resulting algorithm exhibits high utility, while ensuring differential privacy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.