Paper detail

B to V, A, T Tensor Form Factors in the Covariant Light-Front Approach: Implications on Radiative B Decays

We reanalyze the $B\to M$ tensor form factors in a covariant light-front quark model, where $M$ represents a vector meson $V$, an axial-vector meson $A$, or a tensor meson $T$. The treatment of masses and mixing angles in the $K_{1A,1B}$ systems is improved, where $K_{1A}$ and $K_{1B}$ are the $^3P_1$ and $^1P_1$ states of the axial-vector meson $K_1$, respectively. Rates of $B\to Mγ$ decays are then calculated using the QCD factorization approach. The updated $B\to K^*γ$, $B\to K_1(1270)γ$, $K_1(1400)γ$ and $K_2γ$ rates agree with the data. The $K_1(1270)$--$K_1(1400)$ mixing angle is found to be about $51^\circ$. The sign of the mixing angle is fixed by the observed relative strength of $B\to K_1(1270)γ$ and $K_1(1400)γ$. The formalism is then applied to $B_s\to M$ tensor form factors. We find that the calculated $B_s\to ϕγ$ rate is consistent with experiment, though in the lower end of the data. The branching fractions of $B_s\to f_1(1420)γ$ and $f'_2(1525)γ$ are predicted to be of order $10^{-5}$ and it will be interesting to search for these modes. Rates on $B_s\to f_1(1285)γ$, $h_1(1380)γ$, $h_1(1170)γ$, $f_2(1270)γ$ decays are also predicted.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.