Paper detail

$B \to K_1 γ$ Decays in the Light-Cone QCD Sum Rules

We present a detailed study of $B\to K_1(1270) γ$ and $B\to K_1(1400) γ$ decays. Using the light-cone sum rule technique, we calculate the $B\to K_{1A} (1^3P_1)$ and $B\to K_{1B} (1^1P_1)$ tensor form factors, $T_1^{K_{1A}}(0)$ and $T_1^{K_{1B}}(0)$, where the contributions are included up to the first order in $m_{K_1}/m_b$. We resolve the sign ambiguity of the $K_1(1270)$--$K_1(1400)$ mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$ by defining the signs of decay constants, $f_{K_{1A}}$ and $f_{K_{1B}}^\perp$. From the comparison of the theoretical calculation and the data for decays $B\to K_1 γ$ and $τ^-\to K_1^-(1270)ν_τ$, we find that $θ_{K_1}=-(34\pm 13)^\circ$ is favored. In contrast to $B\to K^* γ$, the hard-spectator contribution suppresses the $B\to K_1(1270) γ$ and $B\to K_1(1400) γ$ branching ratios slightly. The predicted branching ratios are in agreement with the Belle measurement within the errors. We point out that a more precise measurement for the ratio $R_{K_1}={\cal B}(B\to K_1(1400)γ)/{\cal B}(B\to K_1(1270)γ)$ can offer a better determination for the $θ_{K_1}$ and consequently the theoretical uncertainties can be reduced.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.