Paper detail

$B^{(*)}\bar B^{(*)}$ intermediate state contribution to $Υ(4S,5S)\to η_b+γ$ radiative decay

In this work, we investigate the re-scattering effects in the radiative decay $Υ(5S)\toη_b+γ$, which were suggested to be crucially important for understanding the anomalous largeness of the branching ratios $B(Υ(5S)\to Υ(1S)+ππ)$ and $B(Υ(5S)\to Υ(1S)+η)$. Our calculations show that the re-scattering effects may enhance $Γ(Υ(10860)\to η_b+γ)$ by four orders, but the tetraquark structure does not. Recently the BaBar and CLEO collaborations have measured the mass of ${η_b}$ and the branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(Υ(2S)\rightarrowη_b+γ)$, $\mathcal{B}(Υ(3S)\rightarrowη_b+γ)$. We hope that very soon, $Υ(10860)\to η_b+γ$ will be measured and it would be an ideal opportunity for testing whether the re-scattering or the tetraquark structure is responsible for the anomaly of $\mathcal{B}\big(Υ(5S)\rightarrowΥ(nS)π^+π^- (n=1,2,3)\big)$, $i.e.$, the future measurements on the radiative decays of $Υ(5S)$ might be a touchstone of the two mechanisms.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.