Paper detail

Axion coupling in the hybrid Wannier representation

Many magnetic point-group symmetries induce a topological classification on crystalline insulators, dividing them into those that have a nonzero quantized Chern-Simons magnetoelectric coupling ("axion-odd" or "topological"), and those that do not ("axion-even" or "trivial"). For time-reversal or inversion symmetries, the resulting topological state is usually denoted as a "strong topological insulator" or an "axion insulator" respectively, but many other symmetries can also protect this "axion $Z_2$" index. Topological states are often insightfully characterized by choosing one crystallographic direction of interest, and inspecting the hybrid Wannier (or equivalently, the non-Abelian Wilson-loop) band structure, considered as a function of the two-dimensional Brillouin zone in the orthogonal directions. Here, we systematically classify the axion-quantizing symmetries, and explore the implications of such symmetries on the Wannier band structure. Conversely, we clarify the conditions under which the axion$Z_2$ index can be deduced from the Wannier band structure. In particular, we identify cases in which a counting of Dirac touchings between Wannier bands, or a calculation of the Chern number of certain Wannier bands, or both, allows for a direct determination of the axion $Z_2$ index. We also discuss when such symmetries impose a "flow" on the Wannier bands, such that they are always glued to higher and lower bands by degeneracies somewhere in the projected Brillouin zone, and the related question of when the corresponding surfaces can remain gapped, thus exhibiting a half-quantized surface anomalous Hall conductivity. Our formal arguments are confirmed and illustrated in the context of tight-binding models for several paradigmatic axion-odd symmetries including time reversal, inversion, simple mirror, and glide mirror symmetries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.