Paper detail

AvoidBench: A high-fidelity vision-based obstacle avoidance benchmarking suite for multi-rotors

Obstacle avoidance is an essential topic in the field of autonomous drone research. When choosing an avoidance algorithm, many different options are available, each with their advantages and disadvantages. As there is currently no consensus on testing methods, it is quite challenging to compare the performance between algorithms. In this paper, we propose AvoidBench, a benchmarking suite which can evaluate the performance of vision-based obstacle avoidance algorithms by subjecting them to a series of tasks. Thanks to the high fidelity of multi-rotors dynamics from RotorS and virtual scenes of Unity3D, AvoidBench can realize realistic simulated flight experiments. Compared to current drone simulators, we propose and implement both performance and environment metrics to reveal the suitability of obstacle avoidance algorithms for environments of different complexity. To illustrate AvoidBench's usage, we compare three algorithms: Ego-planner, MBPlanner, and Agile-autonomy. The trends observed are validated with real-world obstacle avoidance experiments.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.