Paper detail

Average radial integrability spaces, tent spaces and integration operators

We deal with a Carleson measure type problem for the tent spaces $AT_{p}^{q}(α)$ in the unit disc of the complex plane. They consist of the analytic functions of the tent spaces $T_{p}^{q}(α)$ introduced by Coifman, Meyer and Stein. Well known spaces like the Bergman spaces arise as a special case of this family. Let $s,t,p,q\in (0,\infty)$ and $α>0\,.$ We find necessary and sufficient conditions on a positive Borel measure $μ$ of the unit disc in order to exist a positive constant $C $ such that $$ \int_{\mathbb{T}} \left(\int_{Γ(ξ)} |f(z)|^{t}\ dμ(z)\right)^{s/t}\ |dξ|\leq C \|f\|^s_{T_{p}^{q}(α)} \,,\quad f\in AT_{p}^{q}(α)\,, $$ where $Γ(ξ) = Γ_M (ξ)=\{ z\in \mathbb{D} : |1-\barξ z |< M (1-|z|^2)\},$ $M> 1/2 $ and $ξ$ is a boundary point of the unit disk. This problem was originally posed by D. Luecking. We apply our results to the study of the action of the integration operator $T_g$, also known as Pommerenke operator, between the average integrability spaces $RM(p,q) ,$ for $p,q\in [1,\infty)$. These spaces have appeared recently in the work of the first author with M. D. Contreras and L. Rodríguez-Piazza. We also consider the action from an $RM(p,q)$ to a Hardy space $H^s$, where $ p,q,s \in [1,\infty)$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.