Paper detail

Avalanche-size distribution at the depinning transition: A numerical test of the theory

We calculate numerically the sizes S of jumps (avalanches) between successively pinned configurations of an elastic line (d=1) or interface (d=2), pulled by a spring of (small) strength m^2 in a random-field landscape. We obtain strong evidence that the size distribution, away from the small-scale cutoff, takes the form P(S) = p(S/S_m) <S>/S_m^2, where S_m:=<S^2>/(2<S>), proportional to m^(-d-zeta), is the scale of avalanches, and zeta the roughness exponent at the depinning transition. Measurement of the scaling function f(s) := s^tau p(s) is compared with the predictions from a recent Functional RG (FRG) calculation, both at mean-field and one-loop level. The avalanche-size exponent tau is found in good agreement with the conjecture tau = 2- 2/(d+zeta), recently confirmed to one loop via the FRG. The function f(s) exhibits a shoulder and a stretched exponential decay at large s, with ln f(s) proportional to - s^delta, and delta approximately 7/6 in d=1. The function f(s), universal ratios of moments, and the generating function <exp(lambda s)> are found in excellent agreement with the one-loop FRG predictions. The distribution of local avalanche sizes, i.e. of the jumps of a subspace of the manifold of dimension d', is also computed and compared to our FRG predictions, and to the conjecture tau' =2- 2/(d'+zeta).

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.