Paper detail

Automatically Identifying Political Ads on Facebook: Towards Understanding of Manipulation via User Targeting

The reports of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections brought into the center of public attention concerns related to the ability of foreign actors to increase social discord and take advantage of personal user data for political purposes. It has raised questions regarding the ways and the extent to which data can be used to create psychographical profiles to determine what kind of advertisement would be most effective to persuade a particular person in a particular location for some political event. In this work, we study the political ads dataset collected by ProPublica, an American nonprofit newsroom, using a network of volunteers in the period before the 2018 US midterm elections. We first describe the main characteristics of the data and explore the user attributes including age, region, activity, and more, with a series of interactive illustrations. Furthermore, an important first step towards understating of political manipulation via user targeting is to identify politically related ads, yet manually checking ads is not feasible due to the scale of social media advertising. Consequently, we address the challenge of automatically classifying between political and non-political ads, demonstrating a significant improvement compared to the current text-based classifier used by ProPublica, and study whether the user targeting attributes are beneficial for this task. Our evaluation sheds light on questions, such as how user attributes are being used for political ads targeting and which users are more prone to be targeted with political ads. Overall, our contribution of data exploration, political ad classification and initial analysis of the targeting attributes, is designed to support future work with the ProPublica dataset, and specifically with regard to the understanding of political manipulation via user targeting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.