Paper detail

Automatic identification of diagnosis from hospital discharge letters via weakly-supervised Natural Language Processing

Identifying patient diagnoses from discharge letters is essential to enable large-scale cohort selection and epidemiological research, but traditional supervised approaches rely on extensive manual annotation, which is often impractical for large textual datasets. In this study, we present a novel weakly-supervised Natural Language Processing pipeline designed to classify Italian discharge letters without requiring manual labelling. After extracting diagnosis-related sentences, the method leverages a transformer-based model with an additional pre-training on Italian medical documents to generate semantic embeddings. A two-level clustering procedure is applied to these embeddings, and the resulting clusters are mapped to the diseases of interest to derive weak labels for a subset of data, eventually used to train a transformer-based classifier. We evaluate the approach on a real-world case study on bronchiolitis in a corpus of 33,176 Italian discharge letters of children admitted to 44 emergency rooms or hospitals in the Veneto Region between 2017 and 2020. The pipeline achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 77.68% ($\pm 4.30\%)$ and an F1-score of 78.14% ($\pm 4.89\%$) against manual annotations. Its performance surpasses other unsupervised methods and approaches fully supervised models, maintaining robustness to cluster selection and promising generalizability across different disease types. It allows saving approximately 3 minutes of expert time per discharge letter, resulting in more than 1,500 hours for a dataset like ours. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a weakly-supervised strategy for identifying diagnoses from Italian discharge letters. The pipeline achieves strong performance, is adaptable to various diseases, and offers a scalable solution for clinical text classification, reducing the need for manual annotation while maintaining reliable accuracy.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.