Paper detail

Automatic Exploration Process Adjustment for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Joint Chance Constraint Satisfaction

In reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, exploratory control inputs are used during learning to acquire knowledge for decision making and control, while the true dynamics of a controlled object is unknown. However, this exploring property sometimes causes undesired situations by violating constraints regarding the state of the controlled object. In this paper, we propose an automatic exploration process adjustment method for safe RL in continuous state and action spaces utilizing a linear nominal model of the controlled object. Specifically, our proposed method automatically selects whether the exploratory input is used or not at each time depending on the state and its predicted value as well as adjusts the variance-covariance matrix used in the Gaussian policy for exploration. We also show that our exploration process adjustment method theoretically guarantees the satisfaction of the constraints with the pre-specified probability, that is, the satisfaction of a joint chance constraint at every time. Finally, we illustrate the validity and the effectiveness of our method through numerical simulation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.