Paper detail

Automatic Detection of Performance Anomalies in Task-Parallel Programs

To efficiently exploit the resources of new many-core architectures, integrating dozens or even hundreds of cores per chip, parallel programming models have evolved to expose massive amounts of parallelism, often in the form of fine-grained tasks. Task-parallel languages, such as OpenStream, X10, Habanero Java and C or StarSs, simplify the development of applications for new architectures, but tuning task-parallel applications remains a major challenge. Performance bottlenecks can occur at any level of the implementation, from the algorithmic level (e.g., lack of parallelism or over-synchronization), to interactions with the operating and runtime systems (e.g., data placement on NUMA architectures), to inefficient use of the hardware (e.g., frequent cache misses or misaligned memory accesses); detecting such issues and determining the exact cause is a difficult task. In previous work, we developed Aftermath, an interactive tool for trace-based performance analysis and debugging of task-parallel programs and run-time systems. In contrast to other trace-based analysis tools, such as Paraver or Vampir, Aftermath offers native support for tasks, i.e., visualization, statistics and analysis tools adapted for performance debugging at task granularity. However, the tool currently does not provide support for the automatic detection of performance bottlenecks and it is up to the user to investigate the relevant aspects of program execution by focusing the inspection on specific slices of a trace file. In this paper, we present ongoing work on two extensions that guide the user through this process.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.