Paper detail

Automated Testing for Deep Learning Systems with Differential Behavior Criteria

In this work, we conducted a study on building an automated testing system for deep learning systems based on differential behavior criteria. The automated testing goals were achieved by jointly optimizing two objective functions: maximizing differential behaviors from models under testing and maximizing neuron coverage. By observing differential behaviors from three pre-trained models during each testing iteration, the input image that triggered erroneous feedback was registered as a corner-case. The generated corner-cases can be used to examine the robustness of DNNs and consequently improve model accuracy. A project called DeepXplore was also used as a baseline model. After we fully implemented and optimized the baseline system, we explored its application as an augmenting training dataset with newly generated corner cases. With the GTRSB dataset, by retraining the model based on automated generated corner cases, the accuracy of three generic models increased by 259.2%, 53.6%, and 58.3%, respectively. Further, to extend the capability of automated testing, we explored other approaches based on differential behavior criteria to generate photo-realistic images for deep learning systems. One approach was to apply various transformations to the seed images for the deep learning framework. The other approach was to utilize the Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) technique, which was implemented on MNIST and Driving datasets. The style transferring capability has been observed very effective in adding additional visual effects, replacing image elements, and style-shifting (virtual image to real images). The GAN-based testing sample generation system was shown to be the next frontier for automated testing for deep learning systems.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.