Paper detail

Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning with Corrupted Data Sources

Federated learning provides a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving training process by enabling learning statistical models with massive participants while keeping their data in local clients. However, standard federated learning techniques that naively minimize an average loss function are vulnerable to data corruptions from outliers, systematic mislabeling, or even adversaries. In addition, it is often prohibited for service providers to verify the quality of data samples due to the increasing concern of user data privacy. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning (arfl), a novel approach that jointly learns the global model and the weights of local updates to provide robustness against corrupted data sources. We prove a learning bound on the expected risk with respect to the predictor and the weights of clients, which guides the definition of the objective for robust federated learning. The weights are allocated by comparing the empirical loss of a client with the average loss of the best p clients (p-average), thus we can downweight the clients with significantly high losses, thereby lower their contributions to the global model. We show that this approach achieves robustness when the data of corrupted clients is distributed differently from benign ones. To optimize the objective function, we propose a communication-efficient algorithm based on the blockwise minimization paradigm. We conduct experiments on multiple benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, FEMNIST and Shakespeare, considering different deep neural network models. The results show that our solution is robust against different scenarios including label shuffling, label flipping and noisy features, and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in most scenarios.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.