Paper detail

Auto-tuning of Deep Neural Networks by Conflicting Layer Removal

Designing neural network architectures is a challenging task and knowing which specific layers of a model must be adapted to improve the performance is almost a mystery. In this paper, we introduce a novel methodology to identify layers that decrease the test accuracy of trained models. Conflicting layers are detected as early as the beginning of training. In the worst-case scenario, we prove that such a layer could lead to a network that cannot be trained at all. A theoretical analysis is provided on what is the origin of those layers that result in a lower overall network performance, which is complemented by our extensive empirical evaluation. More precisely, we identified those layers that worsen the performance because they would produce what we name conflicting training bundles. We will show that around 60% of the layers of trained residual networks can be completely removed from the architecture with no significant increase in the test-error. We will further present a novel neural-architecture-search (NAS) algorithm that identifies conflicting layers at the beginning of the training. Architectures found by our auto-tuning algorithm achieve competitive accuracy values when compared against more complex state-of-the-art architectures, while drastically reducing memory consumption and inference time for different computer vision tasks. The source code is available on https://github.com/peerdavid/conflicting-bundles

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.