Paper detail

Auditable Register Emulations

The widespread prevalence of data breaches amplifies the importance of auditing storage systems. In this work, we initiate the study of auditable storage emulations, which provide the capability for an auditor to report the previously executed reads in a register. We precisely define the notion of auditable register and its properties, and establish tight bounds and impossibility results for auditable storage emulations in the presence of faulty storage objects. Our formulation considers loggable read-write registers that securely store data using information dispersal and support fast reads. In such a scenario, given a maximum number~$f$ of faulty storage objects and a minimum number~$τ$ of data blocks required to recover a stored value, we prove that (1) auditability is impossible if $τ\leq 2f $; (2) implementing a weak form of auditability requires $τ\geq 3f+1$; and (3) a stronger form of auditability is impossible. We also show that signing read requests overcomes the lower bound of weak auditability, while totally ordering operations or using non-fast reads enables strong auditability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.