Paper detail

Attacks and Defenses for Free-Riders in Multi-Discriminator GAN

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are increasingly adopted by the industry to synthesize realistic images. Due to data not being centrally available, Multi-Discriminator (MD)-GANs training framework employs multiple discriminators that have direct access to the real data. Distributedly training a joint GAN model entails the risk of free-riders, i.e., participants that aim to benefit from the common model while only pretending to participate in the training process. In this paper, we conduct the first characterization study of the impact of free-riders on MD-GAN. Based on two production prototypes of MD-GAN, we find that free-riders drastically reduce the ability of MD-GANs to produce images that are indistinguishable from real data, i.e., they increase the FID score -- the standard measure to assess the quality of generated images. To mitigate the model degradation, we propose a defense strategy against free-riders in MD-GAN, termed DFG. DFG distinguishes free-riders and benign participants through periodic probing and clustering of discriminators' responses based on a reference response of free-riders, which then allows the generator to exclude the detected free-riders from the training. Furthermore, we extend our defense, termed DFG+, to enable discriminators to filter out free-riders at the variant of MD-GAN that allows peer exchanges of discriminators networks. Extensive evaluation on various scenarios of free-riders, MD-GAN architecture, and three datasets show that our defenses effectively detect free-riders. With 1 to 5 free-riders, DFG and DFG+ averagely decreases FID by 5.22% to 11.53% for CIFAR10 and 5.79% to 13.22% for CIFAR100 in comparison to an attack without defense. In a shell, the proposed DFG(+) can effectively defend against free-riders without affecting benign clients at a negligible computation overhead.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.