Paper detail

Atomic-resolution elemental mapping at cryogenic temperatures enabled by direct electron detection

Spectroscopic mapping by scanning transmission electron microscopy coupled with electron energy loss spectroscopy (STEM-EELS) is a powerful technique for determining the structure and chemistry of a wide range of materials and interfaces. The extension of this technique to cryogenic temperatures opens the door to new experiments across many fields including materials physics, energy storage and conversion, and biology. Such experiments, however, often face signal limitations due to sample sensitivity or the need for rapid data acquisition under less stable cryogenic conditions. Compared to traditional indirect detection systems such as charge coupled devices (CCDs), direct electron detectors (DEDs) offer improved detective quantum efficiencies, narrower point spread functions, and superior signal-to-noise ratios. Here, we compare the performance of a Gatan K2 Summit DED to an UltraScan 1000 CCD for use in signal-limited atomic-resolution STEM-EELS experiments. Due to its improved point spread function, the DED's energy resolution remains comparable to that of the CCD at a 5 times lower dispersion, providing simultaneous access to a much broader total energy range without sacrificing spectral resolution. More importantly, the benefits of direct detection enable a variety of low-signal experiments, including atomic-resolution mapping of minor and high energy edges such as the La-M$_{2,3}$ edge at 1123 eV and the Bi-M$_{4,5}$ edge at 2580 eV. For rapid acquisitions at 400 spectra per second, elemental maps recorded with the DED show an up to 40 percent increase in atomic lattice fringe contrast compared to those acquired with the CCD. Taking advantage of these performance improvements and the fast readout of the K2 DED, we use direct detection STEM-EELS to demonstrate atomic-resolution elemental mapping at cryogenic temperatures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.